Category — Transit
Vancouver closing in on walking, cycling, transit goals five years early, but cloud hangs over transit’s future
Vancouver is on track to achieve its Greenest City goal of having 50 percent of all trips in the city by walking, cycling or transit five years ahead of schedule, according to a report to council today, but it will be a “big challenge to get more people on the transit system at this time,” says transportation engineer Lon LaClaire.
LaClaire was presenting impressive new numberson the dramatic changes in the city’s transportation patterns, including an 11 percent jump in cycling trips in the last year. This has been achieved without reducing the absolute numbers of car trips.
But LaClaire warned that additional progress will require more investment in transit because of the current crowding on Translink buses and trains. People make the shift to transit because they enjoy the experience, he told Mayor Gregor Robertson, and can switch back to cars because of a single negative trip.
So the possibility of a “no” vote in the transit referendum is casting a shadow over further progress.
May 12, 2015
Ottawa’s modest but important budget commitment to transit funding has one important catch, thanks to the provincial government: Metro municipalities need a Yes vote in the current transit and transportation referendum to match senior government contributions.
That was Mayor Gregor Robertson’s message yesterday, but there was more good news in a recent assessment of Translink’s efficiency gains by Victoria transportation analyst Todd Litman.
As Burnaby News Leader reporter Jeff Nagel wrote yesterday, Litman’s review of Translink’s costs found it was more efficient that most North American cities and can compare itself to transit veterans like Chicago and San Francisco. What’s more, transit riders themselves are bearing 55 percent of Translink’s costs with fares, a higher share than most other jurisdictions.
More efficiency, federal funding beginning to flow . . . all that’s needed now is a solid Yes vote to begin long-awaited investments in Metro transit infrastructure.
April 22, 2015
“Where can I get my Yes button?” demanded the woman next to the back door on the Number 50. “You can have mine,” I told her. “I can’t wear it where I’m going now,” she told me in a low voice, “but I”ll put it on right after.”
It was just one of many conversations in the last week that tell me a real debate is under way across the region about the Better Transportation and Transit Plan as ballots reach every household. (Everyone is supposed to have one by tomorrow, but a number of UEL and UBC residents at a meeting last night were still waiting.)
It’s still unfashionable to be out and proud about supporting the Mayors’ Council plan, but many people do want to see congestion reduced, commuting times slashed and all the economic benefits that flow from the proposal.
The Translink haters have had their day. I think many will be voting Yes in the privacy of their homes.
Will it be in time to put the Yes team over the line? That remains to be seen, but in the course of four public forums in the last week and a number of other encounters, I find lots of room for optimism: [Read more →]
March 26, 2015
Buried deep in the new Mayors’ Council assessment on the cost of congestion — about $2 billion if the Mayor’s Plan investments in transportation and traffic are not approved — is the conclusion that the cost of driving for the the average driver is about 21 cents a kilometre. Stated in time, it’s about $16.69 an hour.
Cut congestion and you save plenty, easily a couple of dollars a day compared to the roughly 38 cents a day the Mayors’ Plan would cost.
Am I missing something here? Shouldn’t that make a No vote out of the question?
Total cost of congestion to drivers is thought to be more than $400 million, including a “deadweight cost” of more than $200 million. (If the referendum fails, that deadweight cost should be renamed the Bateman Factor to commemorate anti-transit campaigner Jordan Bateman.)
The No advocates say they’re not in favour of congestion, they just want to teach Translink a lesson. Isn’t that kind of like voting to cut the police budget because the crime rate is rising? Or slashing health care because you don’t like the health minister?
Enough. Here’s the calculation for the economists in the crowd, from page 29: [Read more →]
February 16, 2015